Bush and Congress at odds over Iraq war

Bush and Congress at odds over Iraq war
By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Iraq war lumbered into its fifth year Monday with President Bush pleading for patience to let his revised battle plan work and Congress' new Democratic leaders retorting that no patience remains.

"The new strategy will need more time to take effect," Bush said in remarks televised from the White House to mark the four years since he ordered the invasion. He challenged Congress to send him a war funding bill "without strings and without delay."

He got a swift response from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record).

"The American people have lost confidence in President Bush's plan for a war without end in Iraq," said Pelosi, D-Calif. "That failed approach has been rejected by the voters in our nation and it will be rejected by the Congress."

Four years in, the war has claimed the lives of more than 3,200 members of the U.S. military. Predictions about the cost and length of the war have been far surpassed. The public overwhelmingly opposes the war, and Bush's approval rating stands near his all-time low. Trying to halt spiraling sectarian bloodshed, Bush has ordered nearly 30,000 more combat and support troops to Iraq, mostly to stabilize Baghdad.

"Until Baghdad's citizens feel secure in their own homes and neighborhoods," Bush said, "it will be difficult for Iraqis to make further progress toward political reconciliation or economic rebuilding, steps necessary for Iraq to build a democratic society."

From Capitol Hill, House Democratic Whip James Clyburn (news, bio, voting record) of South Carolina said Democrats were intent on "ending the blank check for the president's war and setting a timeline for the phased redeployment of our U.S. military." The House will vote this week on legislation that would effectively require the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by next year, while providing funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for the year.

"By August 2008 at the latest, U.S. combat troops will be redeployed from Iraq," said Clyburn.

A new poll reflected the stress and hopelessness that are the result of the unrelenting violence and uncertain political situation. The poll, by ABC News, USA Today, the BBC and ARD German TV, found only 18 percent of Iraqis have confidence in U.S. and coalition troops, 86 percent are concerned that someone in their household will be a victim of violence and 51 percent say violence against American forces is acceptable.

There were modest anti-war demonstrations in cities from coast to coast to mark the anniversary Monday. Protesters tried to block the New York Stock Exchange and several were detained. In Trenton, N.J., Bruce Tonari, a Vietnam veteran, said, "We lost our moral authority and we have to get it back."

A joint security crackdown by U.S. and Iraqi forces in Baghdad and the troubled Anbar Province began Feb. 14. Bush said "success will take months, not days or weeks" — in part because less than half of the U.S. troop reinforcements have arrived in the capital.

"There will be good days, and there will be bad days ahead as the security plan unfolds," the president said.

Still, he reported positive news, some delivered during a briefing on the war with his National Security Council and a later secure videoconference call with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki from Baghdad.

Bush credited Iraqis with deploying 10 army brigades and nine national police brigades to the capital, and al-Maliki's Shiite-led government for allowing U.S. troops to go after Shiite militias as well as Sunni insurgents. He said the security push had already uncovered large caches of weapons and destroyed two major car bomb factories on the outskirts of Baghdad.

He also praised al-Maliki's government for making progress on a law establishing how oil revenue would be shared among the Iraqi people and on a promise of $10 billion in Iraqi money spent on reconstruction.

What he didn't say was that Iraq missed the Dec. 31 target dates to enact the oil law, as well as laws establishing provincial elections and reversing measures that have excluded many Sunnis from jobs and government positions because they belonged to Saddam's Baath party. The U.S. is also pushing for constitutional amendments to remove articles that the Sunnis believe discriminate in favor of the Shiites and Kurds.

Democrats challenged Bush's strategy.

"By diverting attention from al-Qaida and stretching our troops to the breaking point, the Iraq war has made America less safe, not more," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record), D-Nev. "The war can only be won politically and by forcing Iraq's political factions to resolve their differences."

To this end, Democrats are pushing a war spending bill that includes a troop withdrawal deadline of Sept. 1, 2008. That timeline would speed up if Bush cannot certify that the Iraqi government is meeting its own benchmarks for providing security, allocating the oil revenues and making the constitutional amendments.

The spending bill has little chance of getting to Bush's desk, where he has promised a veto, because Democrats have a much-slimmer majority in the Senate. But the White House has worked aggressively anyway leading up to the House vote, fearing it could create momentum in the Senate and send an unwanted message globally.

"They have a responsibility to ensure that this bill provides the funds and the flexibility that our troops need to accomplish their mission," Bush said. "They have a responsibility to pass a clean bill that does not use funding for our troops as leverage to get special interest spending for their districts. And they have a responsibility to get this bill to my desk without strings and without delay."

The House proposal received a political boost Monday, when a large anti-war group said it supports the legislation and would lobby members to vote for it. MoveOn.org said it found 85 percent of its members back the bill even though it would not bring home troops immediately.

The endorsement is likely to put substantial pressure on liberal members who have threatened to oppose the bill because it would not end the war by December.

Hahahaha "without strings and without delay"

Yeah, that'll happen...