Woman's 9/11 survival story questioned

Woman's 9/11 survival story questioned
Thu Sep 27, 11:45 AM ET

NEW YORK - A nonprofit organization for 9/11 survivors removed its president after questions were raised about her harrowing account of how she survived but lost a loved one in the World Trade Center attack.

Tania Head has said that she was badly burned on the 78th floor of the south tower, that she was saved by a man who died trying to save others, and that a dying man handed her his inscribed wedding ring, which she later returned to his widow.

She also said her husband, or fiance, died in the north tower.

The New York Times reported Thursday that none of her claims had been verified. She has described her 9/11 experiences at speaking engagements and led Tribute WTC Visitor Center tours, and her account has appeared, among other places, on the Web site of the World Trade Center Survivors Network.

The board of the nonprofit organization removed her as president and director this week.

"Tania Head is no longer associated with the World Trade Center Survivors' Network," according to a statement on the group's Web site. "Our organization was created so that those affected by the terrorist attacks could help each other through crisis and its aftermath."

Head also is no longer giving tours at the Tribute center. "At this time, we are unable to confirm the veracity of Tania Head's connection to the events of Sept. 11," said the center's CEO, Jennifer Adams.

The Times said Merrill Lynch & Company, where Head told people she had worked, had no record of her employment. She has claimed she had a romantic relationship with a man who is a confirmed 9/11 victim, but the Times said his family and friends had never heard of Head and they discount details of her story.

No telephone listing exists for a Tania Head in New York City. A message left by The Associated Press at a local telephone number for an Alicia Head — a name the Times said Head had also used — was not immediately returned Wednesday.

The Times said Head canceled three interviews in recent weeks, citing her privacy and emotional turmoil, and declined to provide details to corroborate her story. She also told the newspaper she had done nothing illegal and had not filed any claim with the federal Victim Compensation Fund.

She earned no money as president of the survivors group or as a tour guide at ground zero, according to the Times.

I don't even know what to say to this. If she faked a story for sympathy or something, that's beyond pathetic. But she says she never received any money so why else would she fake a story?

But if her story is indeed true, then it must suck to be called a liar and have this snatched away from her.

But it APPEARS that her story has some missing links, so I'm gonna go with her being pathetic.

If she made this up, I'm going with pathetic, and she should have just sat down and wrote a novel about her 'experience'. Probably would have sold a million copies and she could have worked her issues out on paper. If her story was true, it wouldn't be hard to verify.

True, it would be incredibly easy to verify what she says happened.

Though this article doesn't make stuff real clear. She says her husband or fiance died in the attacks? Is it her who's changing her story, or they don't know what her story is? If it's her, they should have made it more clear in the article.

Either way, though, asking the family of her 'husband/fiance' and the wife of the man who gave her his wedding ring to pass on, would certainly validate her claims.

All in all, though, they wouldn't have removed her if they simply suspected it to be a false story. They'd have asked around first, I'm sure.